Citat:
My sister works as stallion manager in a stable. (A really nice stable. This place is cleaner than my house, although such a statement could be considered damning with faint praise.)
"I'll clean the stalls," my sister said. "You can bed them down."
Citat:
I asked my sister if it might not be more efficient and fair if we both cleaned and bedded stalls — meaning, of course, that she do around two-thirds of both cleaning and bedding, and I do around one-third.
Taking much less time to think it out than I am taking to write it out, my sister replied, "Thanks, but it'll go faster if I stick to doing the cleaning and you to the bedding."
And that jogged loose a memory of Ricardo's Law of Comparative Advantage.
Care este diferenta dintre diviziunea muncii si avantajul comparativ ? Nu ma refer la aria de aplicabilitate (piata muncii, respectiv comertul international), ci la diferentele teoretice, abstracte.
1) Mai clar, reprezinta aceeasi teorie, dar se foloseste cite o denumire diferita in functie de domeniul in care se aplica? Exista vreun raport de ordonare intre cele doua?
2) Sau se poate spune ca prima (diviziunea muncii) este legata de teoria valorii-munca incluzind exploatarea (in sensul de coercitie) , iar avantajul comparativ face referire la schimbul voluntar (bazat pe utilitate) ,excluzind faptul ca Ricado a fost adept al teoriei valorii-munca?
3) Sau ca diviziunea muncii creeaza specializare (un avantaj), pe cind avantajul comparativ se refera la o calitate (avantaj) deja existenta?
_________________
The difference between libertarianism and socialism is that libertarians will tolerate the existence of a socialist community, but socialists can't tolerate a libertarian community. – David D. Boaz
